Menu
Protect Our Farms has reviewed candidates on support for farming as a vital part of the local economy, improved governance and better value for our rates.
Mitchell Shire Council elections are underway
Tuesday 8 October | Mail out of ballots starts |
Friday 25 October | Last day to mail back ballot |
Friday 15 November | Results declared |
Authorised by R Clark, PO Box 260 Pyalong 3521
Protect Our Farms is recommending candidates whose values align, in our understanding, with Protect Our Farms’ vision for a flourishing rural economy in the Mitchell Shire. Candidates who have demonstrated support for policies that support the needs of farmers, prudent cost management and strong governance have been ranked ahead of those who have not.
The farming community in Mitchell Shire faces significant challenges, including the proposed Significant Landscape Overlays (SLOs), which will impose new restrictions on farmers. By endorsing candidates, we aim to advocate for officials who will support farming and fair policies that strengthen our community.
The farming community in Mitchell Shire is facing real challenges, particularly with issues like the Significant Landscape Overlays (SLOs) that could impact farmers’ livelihoods. Endorsing candidates is a way for us to advocate for elected officials who represent the best interests of our community and fight for policies that support farmers, not hinder them.
The rankings were based on various factors: survey responses, electoral statements, interviews, and voting records (for current councillors). We used a scoring matrix to evaluate these factors consistently, focusing on governance, support for farming, and financial responsibility.
No. The survey was just one tool among many. Some preferred candidates didn’t complete survey. We also considered public statements, interviews, voting records, and alignment with our values.
No, our survey was designed to focus on broad issues like understanding farming’s importance to the local economy and balancing competing priorities. It helps us gauge their approach to critical issues without binding them to specific policies.
Yes, there were two questions about the SLOs. One was about candidates’ openness to reviewing decisions made based on flawed processes, and the other was about balancing competing priorities—specifically, whether severe restrictions should be imposed on farmers to protect views. These questions were aimed at understanding candidates’ approach, not to lock them into specific policy positions.
We evaluated current councillors based on their voting record on key issues, such as endorsing the Landscape Assessment Study and allocating $7+ million to restore the unused old Goulburn River Bridge. These votes show their priorities in rate spending and consultation processes.
Not at all. Our guide focuses on good governance, transparency, and support for farming. We highlight candidates who understand and support the needs of farmers, but we don’t expect them to commit to specific policies.
No, many community groups across various sectors endorse candidates to ensure their voices are heard at the local government level. See for example Bendigo Sustainability Group, KNOWT, Merri-bek Bicycle User Group and Ballarat Community Alliance who have each prepared voting guides to advocate for candidates aligned with their community’s interests. In a shire where agriculture is an important part of the economy, it’s vital for farmers to be part of this conversation.
No, our focus is purely on advocating for farmers and our rural communities. We endorse candidates we believe will best represent farming interests and strengthen the local economy, benefiting everyone in Mitchell Shire.